The doctor in charge of the Stanford Prison Experiment was Philip G. Zimbardo. Doctor Zimbardo’s experiment was to see if
you put normal people in bad situation will they crumble to the pressure or
react in a way to keep themselves sane. From
watching the documentary I believe the experiment was a success. It was a
success because each person took on their roles and even added some twists that
made it even better and more believable.
I believe there
were many different examples of groupthink occurred in the documentary. One was
Collective rationalization. This was shown because the prisoners felt like they
were actually trapped and stuck there. This happened because when they kept
asking to leave the guards kept saying that they couldn't. This then made the
prisoners reconsider and they stopped asking.
Another example is belief in inherent morality. This occurred when after
a while the prison guards thought what they were doing and how they were
treating the prisoners was ok and the right thing to do. Next were
self-appointed mind guards. This happened when one of the guards decided to
become “John Wayne” the big tough guy and add a twist to the experiment. He decided to then see how far he could push
the prisoner’s limits before they freaked out.
He then became the lead guard and others followed what he did even though
they didn’t agree with it or wanted to do it.
I believe the
Stanford Prison Experiment to be a little too much. I feel this way because
doctor Zimbardo wasn't fully in charge the whole time. For example the “John
Wayne” guard decided to do what he wanted and to verbally abuse the prisoners
and other kinds of abuse. To me the experiment just got out of hand towards the
end and then became unethical.
No comments:
Post a Comment